Beauty|By The Weight Weight Team|August 11, 2026

YSE Beauty Review – The Minis Are the Honest Part

Affiliate disclosure

We earn a commission if you buy through the links on this page — 5%. Everything below was checked on 11 August 2026 against ysebeauty.com’s catalogue and policy pages, plus PubMed and the published clinical literature. Prices are as listed on that date.

YSE Beauty is a small skincare and complexion range — 25 products, $17 to $138, median $68 — built around retinol, vitamin C, tranexamic acid and peptides. Two things stand out. The trial minis are priced fairly, with the retinol mini actually cheaper per millilitre than the full bottle, which is rare enough to be worth saying. And the phrase “broad spectrum” appears zero times across the whole catalogue — including on the SPF.

What It Is and Who It Is For

A focused, mid-market skincare line trading at ysebeauty.com under the corporate name YISE Beauty — the site’s own tagline glosses it as “YISE / wise / adj: having good judgment… most of the time”. The range covers a cleanser, exfoliants, three serums, two moisturisers, an eye cream, an SPF primer and a handful of complexion products, plus bundles.

At 25 products it is refreshingly small. Skincare brands routinely run to hundreds of SKUs designed to be layered into an eleven-step routine; this is a range you could actually hold in your head. On the day we checked, 58 of 60 variants were in stock, and not one product carried an inflated “compare at” price — no permanent fake sale, which is rarer than it should be and which we credit.

The buyer is someone in the market for a mid-priced routine with recognisable actives, who does not want to spend $200 on a single serum but is not shopping the drugstore either. On that framing, most of what follows is about whether the prices match the evidence.

The Minis Are the Honest Part

We check trial-size pricing on every brand we review, because it is where a lot of companies quietly punish curiosity. YSE does the opposite, and we want to lead with it.

ProductFull sizePer mlMiniPer mlMini premium
Last Call Retinol Serum$88 / 30ml$2.93$25 / 10ml$2.500.85× — cheaper
Take It Off Gel-Oil Cleanser$48 / 100ml$0.48$24 / 50ml$0.481.00× — identical
Xtremely Rich Moisturizer$68 / 50ml$1.36$22 / 15ml$1.471.08×
Morning Cocktail Vitamin C Serum$85 / 30ml$2.83$32 / 10ml$3.201.13×
Problem Solver Tranexamic Cream$88 / 50ml$1.76$24 / 10ml$2.401.36×
Skin Glow SPF 30 Primer$54 / 50ml$1.08$23 / 15ml$1.531.42×

The average premium across the range is about 1.2×, the cleanser is identical per millilitre, and the retinol mini is 15% cheaper per ml than the full bottle. For context, we reviewed a pet food brand this month whose trial box cost exactly double per serving, and that is the industry norm rather than the exception.

This matters practically. Skincare is the category where you genuinely cannot know whether something suits you — or irritates you — without putting it on your face for a few weeks. A $25 mini that lets you test an $88 serum at no unit-price penalty is the right way to sell that, and it is the single strongest argument for buying here.

Buy minis first. That is our advice for this brand and it costs us commission to give it.

Every Product and Price

ProductFull sizeMini
Take It Off Gel-Oil Cleanser$48 (100ml)$24 (50ml)
Skin Glow SPF 30 Primer$54 (50ml)$23 (15ml)
Your Favorite Ex Deep Down Exfoliating Gel$58
Xtreme Glow Dewy Peptide Plumping Serum$68
Xtremely Quenched / Xtremely Rich Moisturizer$68 (50ml)$22 (15ml)
Wide Awake Brightening Eye Cream$68
Your Favorite Ex Exfoliating Pads$75 (45 + jar), $65 refill$17 (7, travel)
Morning Cocktail Vitamin C Serum$85 (30ml)$32 (10ml)
Last Call Retinol Serum$88 (30ml)$25 (10ml)
Problem Solver Tranexamic Dark Spot Cream$88 (50ml)$24 (10ml)
Bundles (AM Duo, PM Duo, Trios)$109 – $159Minis trio $49

Free ground shipping over $65, which most single full-size purchases clear. A full routine — cleanser, SPF, retinol, moisturiser — comes to roughly $258 at full size, or about $94 in minis, before any bundle discount.

What Each Active Actually Has Behind It

Skincare ingredients are not equally evidenced, and the gap between the best and the fashionable is very large. Here is what the published literature holds for each of the actives in this range.

ActiveRandomised trials indexedWhere it sits
Sunscreen ($54)62 on skin ageingThe best evidence in skincare, and the cheapest full-size active here
Retinol ($88)54 on retinoids and photoagingThe best-evidenced ingredient; prescription tretinoin is FDA-approved for photoaging
Tranexamic acid ($88)69 on melasmaStrong for one specific problem — pigmentation, not ageing generally
Niacinamide (in several)143Well studied, well tolerated, modest effects. A sensible inclusion
Topical vitamin C ($85)48Real but variable — formulation stability matters enormously
Cosmetic peptides ($68)55 on peptides and wrinklesAn active field, but effects are generally modest and less settled than the above

The one trial worth knowing about

Almost all skincare evidence is short, small and industry-funded. One study is not. Nambour, Australia: 903 adults under 55, randomly assigned to daily sunscreen or discretionary use (with or without β-carotene), skin ageing assessed by microtopography and graded by blinded assessors over 4.5 years. Published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“The daily sunscreen group showed no detectable increase in skin aging after 4.5 years.” Skin ageing was 24% less than in the discretionary group (relative odds 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98). β-carotene did nothing.

Conclusion: “Regular sunscreen use retards skin aging in healthy, middle-aged men and women.” If you buy one thing on this page for anti-ageing reasons, the evidence says it should be the sun protection — which is also the cheapest full-size active in the range.

The Word Missing From the SPF

Which brings us to the one finding that genuinely concerns us. We counted the phrase “broad spectrum” across all 25 product descriptions we retrieved.

It appears zero times — including on the Skin Glow SPF 30 Primer, whose description reads “Always wear your sunscreen… It’s made with SPF 30 plus a blend of hydrating, brightening, and radiance-boosting ingredients”.

Why that matters: “broad spectrum” is a regulated claim in the US meaning a product has passed a test for UVA protection as well as UVB. The SPF number on its own describes protection against sunburn, which is predominantly a UVB effect. UVA is the wavelength most associated with photoageing — the wrinkling, sagging and pigment change people buy anti-ageing skincare for.

And the Nambour trial that established sunscreen prevents skin ageing used a broad-spectrum product. An SPF without a confirmed broad-spectrum claim is not the thing that was tested.

To be fair about what we know: we read the product descriptions from the catalogue feed, not the physical label or the Drug Facts panel. Sunscreens are regulated as over-the-counter drugs in the US and must carry a Drug Facts panel; it is entirely possible the packaging carries a broad-spectrum designation that the marketing copy simply does not repeat. Check the bottle. But a brand telling you to “always wear your sunscreen” would do well to say the word in the copy.

The second issue is dose, and it applies to every SPF primer ever made. SPF is measured in the lab at an application density of 2 mg per square centimetre— considerably more product than anyone applies as a primer under makeup. Under-application reduces the protection you actually get, substantially and non-linearly. That is not a criticism of this product specifically; it is the reason dermatologists tell you an SPF moisturiser or primer is a supplement to sunscreen rather than a replacement for it.

Three Claims That Need Their Footnotes

The copy is mostly restrained — no “dermatologist tested”, no miracle language. Three claims stood out as doing more work than the evidence we could see supports.

The claimOur reading
Peptide serum: clinically proven to deliver 10 visible benefits in 15 minutesAnything happening to skin in 15 minutes is hydration, light diffusion and mild swelling of the stratum corneum. Those are real and they look good — and they wash off. It is not the same as changing skin
Peptide serum: “a potent brightening active four times more powerful than vitamin CThe ingredient is not named and no comparison basis is given. Four times more powerful at what, measured how, against which vitamin C derivative at what concentration? An unnamed comparative multiple is not information
Retinol serum: “This clinically proven serum”Retinoids as a class genuinely are well evidenced, so this is the most defensible of the three — but “clinically proven” implies a trial of this product, and none is cited or linked

None of this is unusual for the category, and none of it is illegal — cosmetic claims about appearance are broadly permitted, and this brand is notably more careful than most (it says dark spots will look better, not that they will be treated). But “clinically proven” without a citation is a phrase we would want backed up before it moved us to a $68 purchase.

Returns, Shipping and the Catch

“We accept returns and/or exchanges of gently used and unopened products within 30 days of purchase.”

Accepting gently used product is exactly the right policy for skincare, and far better than the “unopened only” rule most of the category uses. You cannot know whether a serum irritates your skin without applying it, and a brand that understands this is a brand worth some trust.

The catch is in the next clause. Refunds are issued less outbound and return shipping costs — you pay postage both ways. On a $23 mini, two-way shipping could consume a large share of the refund, which quietly undermines the “try it risk-free” logic that makes the minis attractive.

And “all return and exchange requests are reviewed by the YISE Beauty team — approval is discretionary, not automatic. The policy adds that “a product return may be required”, implying sometimes it is not.

Free ground shipping over $65, which a single full-size serum clears but two minis do not. There is also a subscription option, a loyalty programme and a store finder, suggesting some physical retail presence — we did not verify the stockists.

Why This Is on a Weight-Loss Site

Because a large share of our readers are losing weight on GLP-1 medication, many are watching their face change, and skincare is being marketed hard into exactly that anxiety. So here is what is actually happening, with numbers.

A retrospective cohort study published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery in August 2025 measured midfacial volume on imaging in 20 patients taking GLP-1 agonists — median age 54, average 11.0 kg lost over an average of 321 days.

  • Median decrease in total midfacial volume: 9.0% (IQR 3–14%)
  • Superficial volume fell 11.0%; deep volume 7.0%
  • Weight loss correlated with superficial volume loss (rho 0.590, P = .006) but not deep volume loss
  • Regression: about 7% of midfacial volume lost per 10 kg of total weight lost, primarily from superficial fat pads

The authors describe it as “one of the first quantitative assessment[s] of the ‘Ozempic face’ phenomenon”.

Now the part the skincare aisle will not tell you: that is fat leaving your face, and no topical product replaces fat.

A “plumping” serum plumps the outermost layer of skin with water for a few hours. It does not restore a superficial fat pad, because nothing applied to the skin surface can. If facial hollowing during weight loss is bothering you, the honest routes are a conversation with your prescriber about the rate of loss, and — if you want volume back — a dermatologist or plastic surgeon, not a $68 bottle.

What skincare can genuinely do in this situation is worth stating too, because it is not nothing. Sunscreen prevents further photoageing, which is the one form of facial ageing you can actually intervene in. Retinoids improve skin texture and quality over months. Moisturisers make skin look and feel better immediately. Those are real benefits, they are the cheap end of this range, and they are worth buying. Just buy them for what they do.

How It Works, Step by Step

  1. Start with minis. At roughly a 1.2× average premium — and less for the retinol — there is no good reason to buy full size untested
  2. Clear $65 for free ground shipping, or accept the postage cost. Two minis will not clear it; a full-size serum will
  3. Introduce retinol slowly — two or three nights a week to begin with. Retinoids commonly cause dryness, redness and flaking in the first weeks, and going nightly straight away is the usual reason people abandon them
  4. Do not layer retinol and strong exfoliants on the same night unless you know your skin tolerates it. This range sells both
  5. Use sun protection every morning — and treat the SPF primer as an extra layer over a proper broad-spectrum sunscreen, not as the sunscreen
  6. Give it twelve weeks. Retinoid and pigment studies typically run 12 weeks or more before measuring anything. Judging at two weeks judges hydration
  7. If you return, do it inside 30 days, expect to pay shipping both ways, and expect the request to be reviewed

Eligibility and Availability

Availability: the affiliate program is registered for the United States only, and we have verified nothing outside it. Customer support hours are listed as Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm Pacific.

Who should be cautious. Retinoids are the relevant issue. Retinoid products are conventionally avoided in pregnancy and while trying to conceive, and that is a conversation for your doctor rather than a website. Anyone with rosacea, eczema or a compromised skin barrier should introduce retinol and exfoliants very cautiously if at all. And if you are already using a prescription retinoid, adding an over-the-counter one is redundant at best.

This is consumer information, not medical advice. A changing mole, a lesion that will not heal, persistent facial redness or a rash is a matter for a doctor or dermatologist, not a serum. Patch test anything new, and stop using a product that stings, burns or causes a rash.

Legitimacy and Regulation

CheckResult
Who regulates cosmeticsThe FDA, under the FD&C Act as modernised by MoCRA, which added facility registration and product listing requirements. Crucially, cosmetics are not FDA-approved before sale — no cosmetic is
The sunscreen is differentSunscreens are regulated as over-the-counter drugs, must carry a Drug Facts panel, and “broad spectrum” is a regulated, tested claim rather than marketing language
Catalogue health58 of 60 variants in stock, and zero inflated “compare at” prices across the range
Trading nameProducts and policies use YISE Beauty; the domain is ysebeauty.com. Same business, two spellings
Trustpilot / BBBCould not retrieve, so we report none

That zero-fake-discounts finding deserves emphasis. In most catalogues we audit, between a third and four-fifths of products carry a permanently struck-through “was” price that was never really charged — we measured 78% at one brand this month. Here it is none. Combined with fairly priced minis, that is a consistent picture of a brand not manufacturing urgency.

How It Compares

We did not price competitors to the standard we apply here, so this compares approaches rather than quoting rival prices we have not verified.

OptionWhere it winsWhere it loses
YSE BeautyFairly priced minis; no fake discounts; gently-used returns; small, comprehensible range$85–$88 serums; unnamed comparative claims; no broad-spectrum claim on the SPF; you pay shipping both ways on returns
A dedicated broad-spectrum sunscreenThe one product with a 903-person randomised trial behind it, applied at a proper doseLess elegant under makeup than a primer — which is why people under-apply
Prescription tretinoinFDA-approved for photoaging, stronger and faster than cosmetic retinolNeeds a prescriber; more irritation; not for pregnancy
Drugstore activesSame ingredient families at a fraction of the price; often equally well formulatedLess pleasant textures; no trial sizes; more trial and error
Seeing a dermatologistThe right route for melasma, acne, rosacea or facial volume loss — all of which have real treatmentsCosts more than a serum, and needs an appointment

Who Should Buy, and Who Should Look Elsewhere

Buy here if:

  • You want to try before committing — the minis are the reason to shop this brand
  • You want a small, comprehensible routine rather than a twelve-step ritual
  • You are buying the retinol or the tranexamic cream, which are the best evidence-to-price propositions in the range
  • You value a brand that does not run permanent fake discounts and takes back gently used product
  • You have a specific pigmentation concern — tranexamic acid is a genuinely good choice for that

Look elsewhere if:

  • You need this to be your sunscreen. Buy a dedicated broad-spectrum product and apply it properly
  • You are buying the peptide serum expecting structural change. Fifteen-minute effects are surface effects
  • You are shopping on price — the same actives exist at the drugstore for considerably less
  • You are pregnant or trying to conceive and were buying the retinol. Ask your doctor
  • You are hoping to reverse facial volume loss from weight loss. No topical product does that
  • You want returns to be genuinely free — you pay postage both ways here

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Minis priced fairly — average ~1.2× premium, and the retinol mini is 15% cheaper per ml than full size
  • Zero inflated “compare at” prices across all 60 variants
  • Returns accept “gently used” product within 30 days — the right policy for skincare
  • 58 of 60 variants in stock
  • Real, well-chosen actives: retinol, tranexamic acid, niacinamide, vitamin C
  • A small 25-product range you can actually understand
  • Careful cosmetic wording on pigmentation — “the appearance of dark spots”, not a treatment claim
  • Free ground shipping over $65
  • No “dermatologist tested” or miracle-cure language anywhere

Cons

  • “Broad spectrum” appears zero times in the catalogue, including on the SPF product
  • An SPF primer will almost certainly be under-applied relative to how SPF is tested
  • “Four times more powerful than vitamin C” — unnamed ingredient, no comparison basis
  • “Clinically proven” used with no study cited or linked
  • “10 visible benefits in 15 minutes” describes a temporary surface effect
  • The $68 peptide serum is the weakest evidence-to-price item in the range
  • Refunds are “less outbound and return shipping costs” — you pay both ways
  • Return requests are reviewed, not automatic
  • $85–$88 serums are firmly mid-to-premium for these ingredients
  • No Trustpilot or BBB record we could retrieve

Limitations of This Review

Checked on 11 August 2026 against the ysebeauty.com product catalogue (25 products, 60 variants) and its refund, shipping and help pages, plus PubMed and the published literature. Prices and formulations change; verify on the live site.

We used none of it. Nothing was bought, applied or patch-tested. We cannot tell you how any of it feels, smells, sits under makeup, or whether it irritates — which for skincare is much of what you want to know. This review covers price, claims, ingredients as described, policies and the evidence behind the ingredient classes.

We did not see a full ingredient list (INCI) or a Drug Facts panel for any product, and we do not know the concentrations of any active — which for retinol, vitamin C and tranexamic acid is the difference between a working product and a decorative one. Our “broad spectrum” finding is a count across marketing copy, not an inspection of the label; the packaging may well carry the designation. Check the bottle before relying on it for sun protection.

The trial counts measure how much a question has been studied, not whether a specific product works. No count here is a statement about YSE’s formulations, which have not been independently tested as far as we know. The Nambour trial was conducted in Queensland, Australia, at high ambient UV, which likely maximises the measurable benefit of sunscreen.

The facial volume study is small — 20 patients, retrospective, one centre — and its authors present it as among the first quantitative attempts at the question. The 7%-per-10 kg figure is a regression estimate from that cohort, not a rule. Nothing here is medical advice; skin and weight concerns belong with a clinician.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does YSE Beauty cost?

Checked on 11 August 2026: 25 products from $17 to $138, with a median of $68. Full sizes are $54 for the Skin Glow SPF 30 Primer (50ml), $88 for the Last Call Retinol Serum (30ml), $85 for the Morning Cocktail Vitamin C Serum (30ml), $88 for the Problem Solver Tranexamic Dark Spot Cream (50ml), $68 each for the peptide serum, the moisturisers and the eye cream, and $48 for the cleanser. Bundles run $109 to $159. Free ground shipping over $65.

Are the trial sizes worth buying?

Yes, and this is the most consumer-friendly thing about the brand. We priced every mini against its full size per millilitre. The average premium is about 1.2×, the cleanser mini is identical per ml, and the retinol mini is actually 15% cheaper per ml than the full bottle — $2.50 against $2.93. For comparison, we have reviewed brands this month whose trial size cost exactly double per unit. Buying a $25 mini to find out whether an $88 serum suits you is a genuinely fair deal.

Which product has the strongest evidence behind it?

The sunscreen, by a distance, and it is the cheapest full-size active in the range at $54. A randomised trial of 903 adults in Nambour, Australia, published in Annals of Internal Medicine, found the daily-sunscreen group showed "no detectable increase in skin aging after 4.5 years", with 24% less skin ageing than the discretionary-use group (relative odds 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98). Nothing else in skincare has evidence of that quality.

What about the retinol?

Retinoids are the best-evidenced topical anti-ageing ingredient after sunscreen. PubMed indexes 54 randomised controlled trials on retinoids and photoaging, and prescription tretinoin is FDA-approved for the treatment of photoaging — which no cosmetic ingredient is. Over-the-counter retinol is weaker than prescription tretinoin and works more slowly, but it is in the right family. At $88 for 30ml it is the priciest item in the range and the second-best evidenced.

Is the peptide serum worth $68?

It is the weakest evidence-to-price ratio in the range, in our reading. Peptides are a real research area, and searches for cosmetic peptides and wrinkles return 55 randomised trials, but the effects reported are generally modest and the field is far less settled than retinoids or sunscreen. The product is described as "clinically proven to deliver 10 visible benefits in 15 minutes" — a fifteen-minute effect on skin is a hydration and light-diffusion effect, which is real but temporary and washes off. That is a different thing from changing the skin.

Does the tranexamic acid cream work for dark spots?

Tranexamic acid has genuinely good evidence for melasma specifically — PubMed indexes 69 randomised controlled trials on tranexamic acid and melasma, which is a substantial base for a single cosmetic ingredient. The product pairs it with niacinamide and licorice root extract, both of which are reasonable choices for pigmentation. Note the careful wording on the product page: it says the formula improves "the appearance of dark spots", which is a cosmetic claim, not a treatment claim.

Is there a problem with the sunscreen?

One that matters. The phrase "broad spectrum" appears zero times across all 25 product descriptions we retrieved, including the SPF 30 primer. Broad spectrum is a regulated term meaning a product has been tested to protect against UVA as well as UVB. SPF alone measures protection against sunburn, which is mostly UVB — while UVA is the wavelength most associated with photoageing. The Nambour trial that established sunscreen prevents skin ageing used a broad-spectrum product.

So should I not use it as my sunscreen?

We would not rely on it as your only sun protection, for two reasons. First, we could not confirm a broad-spectrum claim. Second, SPF is tested at an application density of 2 mg per square centimetre, which is far more product than anyone applies as a primer under makeup — under-application reduces real-world protection substantially. Use a dedicated broad-spectrum sunscreen at a proper dose, and treat an SPF primer as a bonus layer rather than the main event.

What is the return policy?

Better than most in skincare, with one catch. The policy states: "We accept returns and/or exchanges of gently used and unopened products within 30 days of purchase." Accepting gently used product is the right policy for a category where you cannot know if something suits you without using it. The catch is in the next clause — refunds are issued "less outbound and return shipping costs", so you pay postage both ways, and all requests are "reviewed by the YISE Beauty team" rather than granted automatically.

Will skincare help with facial changes from weight loss?

Not the underlying change, and it is important to be straight about that. A 2025 study in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery measured midfacial volume on imaging in 20 patients taking GLP-1 agonists and found a median 9.0% decrease in total midfacial volume, with regression indicating roughly 7% of midfacial volume lost for every 10 kg of total weight lost, primarily from superficial fat pads. That is subcutaneous fat leaving the face. No topical product replaces fat — that is a matter for a clinician if it bothers you.

So what can skincare do in that situation?

It can address the surface while the volume question is separate. Sunscreen protects against further photoageing, retinoids improve skin texture and quality over months, and moisturisers improve how skin looks and feels immediately. Those are real benefits and worth having. What a serum cannot do is restore a fat pad — so if you are on a GLP-1 and unhappy with facial hollowing, the honest advice is to raise it with your prescriber, who can discuss the rate of weight loss, and with a dermatologist or plastic surgeon if you want to explore volume restoration.

Is the brand legitimate?

It looks like a well-run small brand. On the day we checked, 58 of 60 variants were in stock, and — unusually — not a single product carried an inflated "compare at" price, which is rarer than it should be. Cosmetics in the US are regulated by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act as modernised by MoCRA, which requires facility registration and product listing but does not involve pre-market approval of cosmetics. The SPF product is a different case: sunscreens are regulated as over-the-counter drugs, not cosmetics.

Verdict

3.6 / 5

A well-behaved small brand with real actives, honestly priced trial sizes and no fake-discount theatre — let down by an unnamed comparative claim, an uncited “clinically proven”, and a sunscreen that never says the word the evidence depends on.

We came in expecting the usual and found a brand doing several things properly. Not one of 60 variants carries a fake struck-through price — we measured 78% at another brand this month. The minis are priced honestly, averaging about a 1.2× premium per millilitre when the industry norm is closer to 2×, and the retinol mini is actually cheaper per ml than the full bottle. And returns accept “gently used” product, which is the only sensible policy in a category where you cannot know if something suits you without wearing it.

The actives are sensibly chosen, too. Retinoids are the best-evidenced anti-ageing ingredient there is, with 54 trials on photoaging behind the class. Tranexamic acid has 69 randomised trials for melasma, which is a serious base for a cosmetic ingredient. Neither is fashionable nonsense.

What holds the score back is the copy. “A potent brightening active four times more powerful than vitamin C” names no ingredient and gives no basis for the multiple. “Clinically proven” appears with no study cited. “10 visible benefits in 15 minutes” describes hydration and light diffusion — genuinely flattering, entirely temporary. And most importantly, “broad spectrum” appears nowhere in the catalogue, including on the SPF — while the one great trial in this field, 903 adults over 4.5 years showing no detectable increase in skin ageing with daily use, tested a broad-spectrum product. Check the bottle; do not rely on a primer as your sunscreen.

And for the readers this site is actually for. If you are losing weight on a GLP-1 and your face is changing, the number is about 7% of midfacial volume for every 10 kg lost, mostly from superficial fat pads. That is fat, and no serum brings fat back. Buy the sunscreen because it prevents the ageing you can prevent, buy the retinol because it improves the skin itself, and take the volume question to a clinician rather than a checkout.

Before You Order

Buy minis first — they are honestly priced and the retinol one is cheaper per ml than full size. Check the SPF bottle for a broad-spectrum designation before trusting it, and use a dedicated sunscreen underneath either way. Introduce retinol two or three nights a week, not nightly, and never on the same night as a strong exfoliant. Give anything twelve weeks before judging. And if you return, do it inside 30 days and expect to pay postage both ways.